Araceli
Araceli is ranked 723rd among girls in 2024 (388 births). Its best rank was 487th, in 2002.
- Rank in 2024
- #723up 81 from 2023
- Births in 2024
- 3880.02% of girls
- Peak year
- 2002573 births
- Best rank
- #487in 2002
- Since 1939
- 19,900people given the name
The story in the numbers
19,900 girls have been named Araceli in the United States since 1939, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 2002, with 573 births.
It is rising: its share of births is at least one and a half times what it was ten years ago.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1996, and the 2000s alone account for 24%. It has spent 51 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among girls, year by year
By decade
| Decade | girls named Araceli | |
|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | |
| 1940s | 34 | |
| 1950s | 216 | |
| 1960s | 746 | |
| 1970s | 2,673 | |
| 1980s | 3,230 | |
| 1990s | 4,179 | |
| 2000s | 4,714 | |
| 2010s | 2,522 | |
| 2020s | 1,581 |
In 2002, its biggest year
Araceli was the 487th most given girl’s name that year. The top five girls’ names of 2002 were Emily, Madison, Hannah, Emma and Alexis. See all of 2002.
Names that rose and fell with Araceli
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Marcelapeak 1999
- Ilanapeak 1992
- Anamariapeak 2001
- Annalisapeak 2005
- Anapeak 1991
- Sheapeak 2005
- Shirapeak 2009
- Danaepeak 2001
Other spellings in the data
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.