Loma
Loma is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 620th, in 1882.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 192174 births
- Best rank
- #620in 1882
- Since 1880
- 2,289people given the name
The story in the numbers
2,289 girls have been named Loma in the United States since 1880, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1921, with 74 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 74 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1925, and the 1920s alone account for 23%. It has spent 32 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among girls, year by year
By decade
| Decade | girls named Loma | |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 41 | |
| 1890s | 114 | |
| 1900s | 220 | |
| 1910s | 431 | |
| 1920s | 532 | |
| 1930s | 317 | |
| 1940s | 311 | |
| 1950s | 184 | |
| 1960s | 113 | |
| 1970s | 11 | |
| 1980s | 10 | |
| 2020s | 5 |
In 1921, its biggest year
Loma was the 859th most given girl’s name that year. The top five girls’ names of 1921 were Mary, Dorothy, Helen, Margaret and Ruth. See all of 1921.
Names that rose and fell with Loma
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Arvillapeak 1924
- Leonapeak 1918
- Lethapeak 1918
- Zelmapeak 1919
- Leolapeak 1920
- Cecilepeak 1918
- Oteliapeak 1923
- Rosiapeak 1925
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.